This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Top Ten Changes to NFPA 13 - 2010 Edition
Share |

Issue 34: Top Ten Changes to NFPA 13 - 2010 Edition

By Kenneth E. Isman, P.E., FSFPE

The 2010 edition of NFPA 131 is now available from the National Fire Protection Association. In preparing the 2010 edition, the five committees responsible for NFPA 13 deliberated over more than 850 proposals and comments to change the document. This article will not attempt to explain the disposition of all those proposed changes. Instead, the top ten most impactful issues, as voted by the National Fire Sprinkler Association (NFSA) Engineering Staff, will be discussed here (with an intention of spreading the discussion out through most of the chapters of the standard). The top ten changes are:

1) Relief Valves and Air Vents. Concerns over interior corrosion of wet pipe systems led to recommendations that air vents be installed to get more air out of all wet pipe sprinkler systems. Interestingly, these recommendations were made in the annex and are not mandatory. However, the committee also grew concerned that if most of the air was evacuated from the sprinkler system, there would be no air pockets into which water could expand (as the pipes get warmer during a day or season), so the committee required all wet pipe systems to have a relief valve. So now, even without an air vent on the system, it will be necessary to install a relief valve. While they were making changes, the committee increased the size of the relief valves from 1/4 inch to 1/2 inch (from 6 mm to 12 mm) and also required the relief valve to be listed. There is no requirement to pipe the relief valve to a suitable drain, but doing so should be common sense.

2) Ceiling Pockets. Three important clarifications were made to the ceiling pocket rules that have been in the standard for several cycles. The first is that a definition of a "ceiling pocket" was added along with annex text to make it clear that channels formed by structural members are not ceiling pockets. The second change was to clarify that the 10 ft (3 m) separation between unprotected pockets only needs to be provided when the sum of the volume of the pockets exceeds 1000 cubic feet (28 m3). This means that two pockets of 500 cubic feet (28 m3) each, or 10 pockets of 100 cubic feet (2.8 m3) each, can be unprotected and still do not need to be separated by 10 ft (3 m). The third change was to clarify how shallow pocket situations are to be protected where the sprinkler deflector (in the lower ceiling elevation) is within 12 inches (0.3 m) vertically from the top of the pocket. Such pockets are considered protected pockets just the same as any pocket with sprinklers elevated into the pocket itself.

3) Seismic Load Tables. In the 2007 edition of the standard, tables were added to indicate the maximum load permitted for a brace to carry in the zone of influence of the brace for schedule 10 and schedule 40 steel pipe, which led everyone to ask, "What about other types of pipe and tube?" For the 2010 edition, the committee has added tables for schedule 5 steel, CPVC pipe and type M copper tube. For types of pipe and tube that do not have a table, the intent of the committee is to allow that type of pipe to be used with the maximum permitted load table for the same pipe material with a thinner wall, or to allow the manufacturer to supply their own load table. So, for schedule 7 steel pipe (for example) one could use the schedule 5 table, or a table generated by the manufacturer.

4) Truncated Density/Area Curves. For the last three cycles of NFPA 13, there has been a spirited debate over whether or not the density/area curves used to protect storage occupancies should be eliminated. For the 2010 edition, a compromise was reached that cut off the top of the curves (above 3000 sq ft - or 280 m2). This makes sense in that the tops of the curves represented small delivery density and large operating areas. There has been some concern that these lower densities might not be capable of controlling a fire, even if the design area is increased.


5) High Clearance to Ceilings in Storage Occupancies. The 2007 edition of the standard required that the clearance from the top of the storage to the ceiling needed to be considered in the sprinkler system design for Class I-IV commodities. The rule was adopted that the sprinkler system needed to be designed for a maximum of 20 ft (6 m) of clearance. So, for example, in a 40 ft (12 m) high building, it was not possible to design the sprinkler system for 10 ft (3 m) high storage; one needed to design it for at least 20 ft high storage. For the 2010 edition, the rules were clarified for rack storage so that the in-rack sprinkler placement could be better understood.

6) Back-to-Back Shelf Storage. The rules for shelf storage have always defined a shelf as "up to 30 inches (0.8 m) wide". But the rules have never been clear on whether aisles needed to be on both sides of the 30 inch (0.8 m) wide shelves or if the shelves could be back-to-back. The committee finally solved the problem by creating a new category of storage called "back-to-back shelf storage" and defining new protecting criteria for the sprinklers.

7) Record Storage. People who attended the 2006 NFPA Annual Meeting will remember that the committee tried to move forward with new rules for protecting records storage (class III commodities in specially arranged racks with specific dimensions and catwalks up through the racks) that were not acceptable to the record storage industry. The folks from the record storage industry showed up in large numbers to vote in favor of removing these new rules from the 2007 edition of the standard, and they were successful at convincing the NFPA membership to do so. In the intervening years between the development of the 2007 and 2010 editions of NFPA 13, the records storage industry worked with the NFPA Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria Committee to run full-scale fire tests aimed at developing better rules. These better rules now appear in the 2010 edition and appear to be acceptable to the record storage industry.


8) Compact Storage. Compact storage modules consist of record storage shelves or bins on movable rails where there is only one aisle. The shelves or bins are moved on their rails to create the aisle where it is needed to get to any particular record. Full scale fire tests conducted with the Fire Protection Research Foundation2 led to the development of criteria under which these filing systems could be used with light hazard fire sprinkler systems. In order to be used with light hazard, the files cannot exceed 8 ft (2.4 m) in height, only paper records can be stored (up to 5% plastic are allowed for file tabs and other miscellaneous items) and the 18 inch (0.5 m) clearance needs to be maintained for the sprinkler deflector over the top of the storage unit. Additional rules also concern the construction and size of the compact storage modules, which need to be provided with metal longitudinal and transverse barriers and cannot exceed 250 sq ft (23 m2) in area in order to use the light hazard rules. Section 20.6 of NFPA 13 provides all of the specific rules.

9) High-Bay Record Storage. High-bay record storage is a combination of the last two items - high-bay record storage that uses a mobile module that slides on rails to open a single aisle where the records need to be stored. But instead of being 8 ft (2.4 m) high like the compact storage discussed above, these modules can be up to 34 ft (10 m) high. The criteria in NFPA 13 is based on full-scale test data that was submitted to NFPA.


10) Hydrostatic Tests. NFPA 13 has always required a 200 psi (1.4 MPa) hydrostatic test, and for years has said that the pressure is measured during the test at the lowest elevation. Some people have interpreted this as meaning that 200 psi (1.4 MPa) is measured at the lowest elevation. Others believed that the intent was to expose every piece of pipe to at least 200 psi(1.4 MPa), so that meant measuring a higher pressure at the lowest elevation to make up for elevation head loss. The NFPA committee clarified for the 2010 edition that the former interpretation is correct. This means that in a building with a 30 ft (9 m) riser, the hydrostatic test is conducted with 200 psi (1.4 MPa) at the base of the riser and the pressure will only be 187 psi (1.29 MPa) at the piping at the top of the riser.

Kenneth E. Isman, P.E., FSFPE, is with the National Fire Sprinkler Association.

  1. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2010.
  2. Schirmer Engineering Corporation, "Compact Mobile Shelving System Fire Testing Project," Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, 2008.

For questions concerning delivery of this e-Newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at (216) 931-9934 or

Corporate 100 Visionaries

About Us

© 2019 SFPE | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy